Thanks Spencer & Kevin for valuable input,
But why it doesn't show this same with the website has its own wikipedia page link.
Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Job Title: Owner
Company: Futura Net Solutions
Futura Internet Services - USA
Favorite Thing about SEO
Challenging
Thanks Spencer & Kevin for valuable input,
But why it doesn't show this same with the website has its own wikipedia page link.
Hi Mozzers & Moz Team,
Let's know how actually this happens to come in Google SERPs with wikipedia link as of its brand name?
It is great to show, but i really want how this comes with brand associated link of wikipedia.
Some sources also come wtih DMOZ if ones don't find in wikipedia.
Please find the snapshot, where i borderd in red color , may show you clear in it.
Waiting the responses.
Hi all Moz pro members ,
Let us come to vote this post https://seomoz.zendesk.com/entries/29971850-Why-Moz-doesn-t-offer-tool-similar-like-SEOprofiler-Link-Disinfection-
about bringing new function tool that we can use to identify the bad or spammy links.
Best,
Teginder Ravi
Thanks @David,
I just submitted this copy to Moz there at http://seomoz.zendesk.com
Hi Moz,
As I have been your member & using pro tool for more than an year, it's been amazing experience working and using your each tool's function tool, wehther to check on-page grader, rank tracking, on-page crawling issue, keyword difficulty and the one my best for link analysis is Open Site Explorer etc.
I came here to ask about something which I didn't find here than other providers is most popular Bad Link Detection Tool. As **SEOprofiler Link Disinfection **offers their customers to use this to get all of their bad or spammy links harming them to rank high or getting away from ranking goal.
Let me know, are you planning anything similar to this to bring soon in your tools and provide your members to take benefits of such type function as well OR should i go to SEOprofiler for this?
Best,
Teginder Ravi
Thanks @Chris, Sounds totally agreed, one has to know first all about their products/services, employees, audience, market, prices, and competition etc.
Hi @Scott,
You need to set geographic location under Google Webmaster tool:
.com to USA
.co.uk to UK
It can only work or set your website for specific country based users.
@monali, You really no need to care this, it is being counted as internal links.
Thanks @Ryan,
As commented -"Relevancy to a site's niche is not a metric in determining whether a link is organic or manipulative. The link's compliance to Google's Quality Guidelines should be the focus. " - thanks for clearing my doubt, It is exactly a focus to know about this whole on Google's Quality Guidelines.
Another as commented - "You each are focusing on what value a link offers to the site. The link's value is not relevant to determining if it is organic vs manipulative. "
But I think, it is really tough to understand what type of a link is organic ? Sometime I feel a links seems pretty natural is also gets caught under Google violation radar. WHY?
@monali, Remove links taken as signature or exact match anchor text. You need to gather all links using opensiteexplorer.org , refine them 1 by 1 to figure out which one has to be removed.
Yes,
These sort of links may hurt your website, you need to remove or let it place nofollow under the link tag.
My bet is to remove only. It's not going to help, single link is enough from 15 links .
Yes, it makes sense to have issue in exact match case with your CA state but I am not sure over this 100% either.
The anchor text you should use here is to mix up your target relevant keywords associated with your brand or company names which help a lot in order to gain natural effect and rank in Google.
Hi all Moz pro members ,
Let us come to vote this post https://seomoz.zendesk.com/entries/29971850-Why-Moz-doesn-t-offer-tool-similar-like-SEOprofiler-Link-Disinfection-
about bringing new function tool that we can use to identify the bad or spammy links.
Best,
Teginder Ravi
Hi Andre,
I am also agreed with you without any proof, as said -
"any form of duplicate content is frowned upon and in theory, if a link exists on a page with content identical to another website, that link would be less valuable"
Let me work on some new project to see the differences, hope it is true as we are thinking.
Best,
Teginder
Wow, I just found this awesome Infographic created by Brian Dean of Backlinko. It's really nice share by him, putting all efforts together into creating this Top 200 Ranking Factors what everybody wants to know now. I am just right now seeing and observing the whole things and points mentioned in this infographic and like to want you all of Moz members to discuss over this.
Thanks esiow2013 & others for discussing on 301 redirect, I also had same issue.
Futura Net Solutions established in 1994, being a pioneer company of Punjab and among the very first IT companies in INDIA, with full operations from headquarters at Ludhiana, and helped business take advantage of Internet Technologies. The tools of technology have been sharpened regularly with rigorous learning and adaptation of latest technologies and so is the quality of service by the highly qualified team of Futura Net Solutions. We at Futura understand both globalization and Internet tools thoroughly. The effective Internet based solutions have been implemented for fuller satisfaction and effective results for Industry.
The clients who have been helped by Futura include the enterprises of India and world over. The world’s largest bi-cycle manufacturer, India’s largest textile exporter group and International businesses from the countries of USA, Thailand, Canada, Norway and U.K. glorify our list of clientele.
Futura with time has cumulated experience to provide E-Business expertise in the following areas:
Offshore software development
Internet & Intranet programming
Web development & designing
Internet marketing & customer support system
Providing successful need based solutions in the following functional areas:
Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.